Comparison of propensity score methods for causal inference : matching, weighting, subclassification, and double propensity score adjustment

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Uncertain Neighbors: Bayesian Propensity Score Matching for Causal Inference

In this paper we compare the performance of standard nearest-neighbor propensity score matching with that of an analogous Bayesian propensity score matching procedure. We show that the Bayesian approach has several advantages, including that it makes better use of available information, since it makes less arbitrary decisions about which observations to drop and which ones to keep in the matche...

متن کامل

Propensity Score Matching for Causal Inference with Relational Data

Propensity score matching (PSM) is a widely used method for performing causal inference with observational data. PSM requires fully specifying the set of confounding variables of treatment and outcome. In the case of relational data, this set may include nonintuitive relational variables, i.e., variables derived from the relational structure of the data. In this work, we provide an automated me...

متن کامل

Propensity Score Methods for Causal Inference with the PSMATCH Procedure

In a randomized study, subjects are randomly assigned to either a treated group or a control group. Random assignment ensures that the distribution of the covariates is the same in both groups and that the treatment effect can be estimated by directly comparing the outcomes for the subjects in the two groups. In contrast, subjects in an observational study are not randomly assigned. In order to...

متن کامل

Head to head comparison of the propensity score and the high-dimensional propensity score matching methods.

BACKGROUND Comparative performance of the traditional propensity score (PS) and high-dimensional propensity score (hdPS) methods in the adjustment for confounding by indication remains unclear. We aimed to identify which method provided the best adjustment for confounding by indication within the context of the risk of diabetes among patients exposed to moderate versus high potency statins. M...

متن کامل

Propensity Score-matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies

This paper considers causal inference and sample selection bias in nonexperimental settings in which (i) few units in the nonexperimental comparison group are comparable to the treatment units, and (ii) selecting a subset of comparison units similar to the treatment units is difficult because units must be compared across a high-dimensional set of pretreatment characteristics. We discuss the us...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation

سال: 2019

ISSN: 1229-1544

DOI: 10.29221/jce.2019.22.2.269